Comparison of Fixed and Variable Pitch Actuators for Agile Quadrotors Citation

The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. This paper presents the design, analysis and experimental testing of a variable-pitch quadrotor. A custom in-lab built quadrotor with on-board attitude stabilization is developed and tested. An analysis of the dynamic differences in thrust output between a fixed-pitch and variable-pitch propeller is given and validated with simulation and experimental results. It is shown that variable-pitch actuation has significant advantages over the conventional fixed-pitch configuration, including increased thrust rate of change, decreased control saturation, and the ability to quickly and efficiently reverse thrust. These advantages result in improved quadro-tor tracking of linear and angular acceleration command inputs in both simulation and hardware testing. The benefits should enable more aggressive and aerobatic flying with the variable-pitch quadrotor than with standard fixed-pitch actuation, while retaining much of the mechanical simplicity and robustness of the fixed-pitch quadrotor.